REDTIGER F7NA vs Viofo A229 Pro: Full Spec Comparison (2026)

Both the REDTIGER F7NA and the Viofo A229 Pro use the Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2 sensor for the front camera — the hardware that drives 4K image quality and low-light performance. But the two cameras diverge on rear camera resolution, screen size, WiFi standard, and price. This comparison covers every verified spec so you can decide which camera fits your use case.

Quick Verdict

Front Sensor: Both Use Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2

The Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2 is a back-illuminated CMOS sensor built for automotive use. Its key advantage over older sensor generations is improved light sensitivity — the STARVIS 2 architecture captures more photons per pixel, producing cleaner footage at night and in borderline conditions like dawn, dusk, and heavy shadow.

For a deeper look at what this sensor generation delivers, see What is Sony STARVIS 2?

The critical point: the F7NA and A229 Pro share the same front sensor. Front-camera image quality at night, in HDR conditions, and at highway speeds will be comparable between the two cameras. The competitive question is everything that surrounds that sensor — rear camera, interface, wireless performance, and price.

Rear Camera: The A229 Pro's Clear Advantage

This is where the two cameras diverge most significantly. The Viofo A229 Pro uses a Sony IMX675 STARVIS 2 sensor at the rear, recording at 2K (2560×1440P). The REDTIGER F7NA's rear camera records at 1080P.

For most rear-camera use cases — capturing a vehicle that hits you from behind, recording plate numbers — 1080P is sufficient. But 2K rear recording provides more detail at greater distances and more room to crop footage in post. If the rear camera's resolution is a priority for your use case, the A229 Pro holds a genuine hardware advantage here.

Where the F7NA Pulls Ahead

Wider front field of view. The F7NA captures 160° compared to the A229 Pro's 140°. A wider FOV captures more of the road environment — adjacent lanes, sidewalks, and approaching vehicles at the periphery — without requiring the camera to pan. In urban driving, the 20° difference is meaningful for capturing incidents off the center axis.

Screen size. The F7NA ships with a 3.69-inch touchscreen. The A229 Pro's screen is 2.4 inches — over an inch smaller. Reviewing footage and adjusting settings is noticeably easier on the F7NA's larger display.

WiFi 6 at 5.8GHz. The F7NA uses WiFi 6 at up to 20 Mb/s. The A229 Pro uses standard 2.4GHz and 5GHz WiFi — not WiFi 6. If you regularly download footage to your phone after incidents, the F7NA's faster transfer speed is a practical advantage.

ADAS suite. The F7NA includes Lane Departure Warning, Forward Collision Warning, and Forward Vehicle Start Alert. Viofo does not list ADAS features for the A229 Pro — verify on their product page before assuming equivalence.

Temperature tolerance. The F7NA's supercapacitor is rated to 158°F (70°C). The A229 Pro's supercapacitor is rated to 149°F (65°C). Both use supercapacitors — no lithium battery degradation — but the F7NA has a slightly higher upper limit, relevant for vehicles parked in direct sun in hot climates.

Price. At $159.99, the F7NA is significantly less expensive. The A229 Pro lists at $359.99 on Viofo's official site; retail pricing at third-party sellers varies — verify before purchase. At either comparison point, the F7NA represents strong value per feature.

Where the A229 Pro Is Competitive

2K rear camera. The A229 Pro's rear camera uses Sony IMX675 STARVIS 2 at 2560×1440P — a genuine hardware advantage over the F7NA's 1080P rear. For drivers who want the highest possible rear footage quality — readable plates at distance, sharper rear-view documentation — the A229 Pro's rear sensor is the spec to note.

Community and track record. Viofo has a longer established presence in the dedicated dash cam market. The A229 Pro has a larger installed base and more published comparative footage tests on YouTube and enthusiast forums. For buyers who weight real-world community testing over spec sheets, Viofo's accumulated record is a legitimate consideration.

Brand trust for insurance use. Some buyers factor in brand recognition when selecting a device that may serve as insurance evidence. Viofo's established reputation in the enthusiast community is genuine.

Price and Value

The F7NA at $159.99 vs the A229 Pro at $359.99 (official) represents a $200 gap — for a camera where the front sensor is identical. The A229 Pro's 2K rear camera and IMX675 sensor is the primary hardware justification for that premium.

If you verify the A229 Pro at a lower retail price (~$229.99 at some third-party sellers), the gap narrows — but the F7NA still offers a wider front FOV, a significantly larger screen, WiFi 6, and ADAS at the lower price point.

The F7NA's Essential Kit at $199.99 bundles the hardwire kit (required for parking mode), CPL filters, and extended warranty — still well below the A229 Pro at any retail channel.

For context on the F7NA across its price tier, see Best Dash Cam Under $200: Top Picks for 2026.

Which Should You Buy?

Buy the REDTIGER F7NA if:

• Your budget is under $200 and you want native 4K with Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2
• A wider 160° front FOV matters for capturing peripheral incidents
• You want a larger screen (3.69") for reviewing footage on the camera
• You transfer clips wirelessly often and want WiFi 6 at 20 Mb/s
• ADAS features (Lane Departure, Forward Collision Warning) are useful for your commute
• You live in a high-temperature region and want the higher supercapacitor rating (158°F vs 149°F)

Consider the Viofo A229 Pro if:

• 2K rear camera resolution (Sony IMX675) is a priority for your use case
• You have used Viofo products before and have confidence in their ecosystem
• You value the larger installed community and volume of comparative footage tests

For drivers focused on front-camera evidence quality, screen usability, and wireless performance, the REDTIGER F7NA is the more practical choice at this price. For drivers who specifically need the highest rear-camera resolution available, the A229 Pro's 2K IMX675 rear is its strongest differentiator.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the REDTIGER F7NA a good alternative to the Viofo A229 Pro?

Yes, for most buyers. Both cameras use Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2 for the front camera. The F7NA adds a 3.69-inch touchscreen (vs 2.4 inches), 160° front FOV (vs 140°), WiFi 6 at 20 Mb/s, and a full ADAS suite — at a price significantly below the A229 Pro. The A229 Pro's main hardware advantage is its 2K rear camera with Sony IMX675 STARVIS 2, compared to the F7NA's 1080P rear.

Do both cameras use the same Sony sensor?

The front sensors are the same: both use Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2. The rear sensors differ: the Viofo A229 Pro uses Sony IMX675 STARVIS 2 at 2K (2560×1440P); the REDTIGER F7NA's rear camera records at 1080P. If rear-camera resolution is a priority, this is the meaningful hardware difference between the two cameras.

Is the Viofo A229 Pro worth the higher price?

It depends on your priorities. The A229 Pro's 2K rear camera with Sony IMX675 is its primary hardware justification for the premium. If rear footage detail at distance matters to your use case, that's a real spec advantage. For most daily drivers where the rear camera's job is capturing a vehicle directly behind you, 1080P is sufficient — and the F7NA's larger screen, wider FOV, WiFi 6, and ADAS at lower cost represent stronger overall value.

Does the F7NA come with a hardwire kit for parking mode?

The standard F7NA at $159.99 does not include a hardwire kit — parking mode requires a hardwire connection to a circuit that stays live when the ignition is off. The Essential Kit at $199.99 bundles the hardwire kit along with CPL filters and an extended warranty, making it the practical option for buyers who plan to use parking mode from day one.

Ready to Buy? The REDTIGER F7NA is $159.99 — or $199.99 as the Essential Kit with hardwire kit, CPL filters, and extended warranty included. Sony IMX678 STARVIS 2 front sensor. Native 4K. WiFi 6. 160° FOV. 3.69-inch touchscreen. Full ADAS.